Practicality and technical communication in CORVI housing typologies

Authors

Abstract

In December 1972, the Sub Department of Design of the Corporación de la Vivienda (CORVI) published a document with eighteen housing prototypes developed by its teams between 1966 and 1971. This document was the result of the previous experience of those teams in developing a large part of the social housing built in Chile, of the work of systematization and standardization of that set of works, and of the design indications given by the managers of these teams. Drawing on the document itself, secondary sources that report on CORVI's decisions, and interviews with Orlando Sepúlveda Mellado, an architect member of CORVI's design teams, this paper analyzes the practical meaning of "Tipología de viviendas racionalizadas 1966-1972" and suggests that it performs a non-canonical mode of the notion of typology, articulates a standardization of project ideas, and responds to the contingencies of the sociomaterial environment. This helps to conclude that the inaccuracies observed in the document are part of an objectual strategy of communication of the technical aspect that aims at its practicality, that is, to efficiently narrate the complexity of architectonic rationalization as a political and socio-technical program.

Keywords:

rationalization, CORVI, typologies, standardization, practicality

Author Biographies

Jorge Eduardo Vergara Vidal, Universidad de Valparaíso

Profesor adjunto Escuela de Sociología Universidad de Valparaíso.

Daniela Álvarez Campos, Universidad de Santiago de Chile

Docente Escuela de Arquitectura Universidad de Santiago de Chile

Diego Asenjo Muñoz, Corporación Municipal de Renca

Coordinador de Proyectos, Dirección de Infraestructura, Corporación Municipal de Renca

References

Anguita, R. (2012). La vivienda, imagen de una ideología social. Documentos de la revista AUCA, 1965-1986. (Tesis doctoral, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, España). http://hdl.handle.net/2117/94798

Argan, G. C. (1983). Tipología. Summarios, (71), 2-14.

Becerra, J. (2016). Vivienda y ciudad, un único proyecto : la unidad vecinal Exequiel González Cortés, 1960-1964. (Tesis doctoral, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, España). http://hdl.handle.net/2117/96117

Benévolo, L. (1963). Historia de la arquitectura moderna. Taurus

Corporación de la Vivienda. (1969). La Corporación de la Vivienda. Oficina de Relaciones Públicas CORVI.

______ (1971). Fundamentos y estructura del plan habitacional.

______ (1972). Tipología de viviendas racionalizadas 1966-1972. Subdepartamento de Diseño CORVI. https://catalogo.minvu.cl/cgi-bin/koha/opac-retrieve-file.pl?id=e01c8b0c4fc725c3a88b56be6dddb72a

Corvi en el centro de la construcción 60 mil viviendas. (1972). Auca: Arquitectura Urbanismo Construcción Arte, (23), 39-66. https://revistaauca.uchile.cl/index.php/AUCA/article/view/59334

De Laet, M. y Mol, A. (2000). The Zimbabwe Bush pump. Social Studies of Science, 30(2), 225–263. https://doi.org/10.1177/030631200030002002

Durand, J. N. L. (2000). Précis of the lectures on architecture. The Getty Research Institute.

Forsyth, T. (2019). Who shapes the politics of expertise? Co-production and authoritative knowledge in Thailand’s political forests. Antipode, 52(4), 1039-1059. https://doi.org/10.1111/anti.12545

Gámez, V. (1999). Algunos antecedentes para el estudio de la doctrina habitacional de la Corporación de la Vivienda. Revista INVI, 14(38), 27-58.

Graaf, R. d. (2017). Four walls and a roof: The complex nature of a simple profession. Harvard University Press

Joerges, B. (1999). Do politics have artefacts? Social Studies of Science, 29(3), 411–431. https://doi.org/10.1177/030631299029003004

Lampland, M. y Star, S. L. (Eds.). (2009). Standards and their stories: How quantifying, classifying, and formalizing practices shape everyday life. Cornell University Press

Law, J. y Mol, A. (2008). The actor-enacted: Cumbrian Sheep in 2001. En C. Knappett y L. Malafouris (Eds.), Material agency, (pp. 57–77). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-74711-8_4

______ (2020). Words to think with: An introduction. The Sociological Review, 68(2), 263–282. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038026120905452

Le Corbusier. (1953). El modulor. Ensayo sobre una medida armónica a la escala humana aplicable universalmente a la arquitectura y a la mecánica. Poseidón.

Martí, C. (2005). La cimbra y el arco. Fundación Caja de Arquitectos.

Moneo, R. (1978). On typology. Oppositions: Journal for Ideas and Criticism in Architecture, (13), 22-45.

Neufert, E. (1995). Arte de proyectar en arquitectura. Gustavo Gili.

Quiroga, H. (1972). Conclusiones. En Corvi en el centro de la construcción 60 mil viviendas. Auca: Arquitectura Urbanismo Construcción Arte, (23), 64-65. https://revistaauca.uchile.cl/index.php/AUCA/article/view/59334

Raposo Moyano, A. (1998). La racionalidad tecno-instrumental en el accionar político-administrativo del Estado: elementos para un modelo descriptivo. Revista INVI, 13(35), 116-138.

Star, S. L. (2010). This is not a boundary object: Reflections on the origin of a concept. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 35(5), 601–617. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243910377624

Suboticki, I. y Sørensen, K. H. (2020). Designing and domesticating an interstructure: Exploring the practices and the politics of an elevator for cyclists. Urban Studies, 58(6), 1229-1244. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098020910334

Winner, L. (1980). Do artifacts have politics? Daedalus, 109(1), 121-136. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20024652

Woolgar, S. y Cooper, G. (1999). Do artefacts have ambivalence. Social Studies of Science, 29(3), 433–449. https://doi.org/10.1177/030631299029003005